About Jack Ryan, Attorney

Jack Ryan is an attorney in Rhode Island, a graduate Juris Doctorate, Cum Laude Suffolk University Law School. Jack has 20 years police experience as a police officer with the Providence Police Department, Providence, RI.Jack’s law degree and experience as a police officer gives him the unique perspective of the legal and liability issues.Jack is a former adjunct faculty member at Salve Regina University and lectures frequently throughout the United States.

Identity Verification

You are viewing an article from the 9th Circuit An issue faced by many jails is the arrestee who is brought into the jail pursuant to a warrant who protests that he is not the person named in the warrant.  [...]

5-19-2009 Ashcroft v. Iqbal

Continue to the end of this article for important commentary by author Jack Ryan, J.D. On May 18, 2009, the United States Supreme Court issued its 5/4 decision in Ashcroft v. Iqbal.i  While at first glance this case had little or nothing [...]

ARIZONA vs. GANT

One of the most frequent questions coming into the Public Agency Training Council’s website in the last week since the Arizona v. Gant case was decided has been how this case would impact an inventory search of a motor vehicle which was [...]

ARIZONA vs. GANT

In Arizona v. Gaunt decided by the United States Supreme Court this week, there is a sentence in the majority opinion which is creating a misconception by the media as well as numerous law enforcement web-sites and commentators reporting on the case. [...]

4/21/2009 ARIZONA vs. GANT

Law enforcement officers throughout the United States recognize their ability to search vehicles incident to the arrest of an occupant.  The foundation purpose of such searches is to prevent the subject from reaching into the vehicle for a weapon or [...]

US SUPREME COURT

In Corley v. United Statesi  the United States Supreme Court considered how a delay in bringing a suspect before a court would impact a confession obtained during the delay. At the outset it must be noted that the Court is reviewing this [...]

Go to Top