About Jack Ryan, Attorney

Jack Ryan is an attorney in Rhode Island, a graduate Juris Doctorate, Cum Laude Suffolk University Law School. Jack has 20 years police experience as a police officer with the Providence Police Department, Providence, RI.Jack’s law degree and experience as a police officer gives him the unique perspective of the legal and liability issues.Jack is a former adjunct faculty member at Salve Regina University and lectures frequently throughout the United States.

US SUPREME COURT

The United States Supreme Court overturned the United States Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit in a police shooting case based on the manner in which the 5th Circuit analyzed the case. The case, Tolan v. Cotton, deals with the manner [...]

US SUPREME COURT

Law enforcement officers shooting into vehicle following an initial pursuit and to prevent a further pursuit did not violate the Fourth Amendment. [i] The United States Supreme Court outlined the facts of Plumhoff v. Rickard as follows: Near midnight on July 18, [...]

US SUPREME COURT

In Navarette v. California [i] the United States Supreme Court examined the validity of a vehicle stop based upon an anonymous 911 caller’s report that the vehicle in question had just run the caller off the road.    The issue before the Court [...]

US SUPREME COURT

In Fernandez v. California [i], the United States Supreme Court clarified language from Georgia v. Randolph [ii], where it was held that officers could not enter a home based on consent when co-occupants were on the scene and one of the co-occupants was consenting while [...]

US SUPREME COURT

Officers have generally been able to continue their pursuit where an officer has probable cause to believe that a suspect has committed a crime and the officer is right on the suspect’s heels. In these cases the officer is not [...]

US SUPREME COURT

In Salinas v. Texas, the United States Supreme Court considered whether a prosecutor could comment on a suspect’s reaction when questioned by law enforcement in a circumstance where the suspect was not in custody and had not been Mirandized.  At the outset [...]

US SUPREME COURT

In Missouri v. McNeely, [i] the United States Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of a forced blood draw on a person who had refused a breathalyzer test.   The Court outlined the facts as follows: ` While on highway patrol at approximately [...]

US SUPREME COURT

In Florida v. Harris [i] the United States Supreme Court applied the totality of circumstances approach to the determination that a law enforcement K-9 was reliable with respect to sniff-alerts for narcotics and rejected the Florida Supreme Court’s much stricter requirements for [...]

US SUPREME COURT

©2012 Jack Ryan, Attorney, PATC Legal & Liability Risk Management Institute (www.llrmi.com) In Ryburn v. Huff [i] the United States Supreme Court examined a lawsuit which was brought against officers of the Burbank, California Police Department.  The officers were investigating a [...]

US SUPREME COURT

©2012 Jack Ryan, Attorney, PATC Legal & Liability Risk Management Institute (www.llrmi.com) In Bobby v. Dixon, [i] the United States Supreme Court reviewed a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit involving the use of a confession [...]

Go to Top