About Jack Ryan, Attorney

Jack Ryan is an attorney in Rhode Island, a graduate Juris Doctorate, Cum Laude Suffolk University Law School. Jack has 20 years police experience as a police officer with the Providence Police Department, Providence, RI.Jack’s law degree and experience as a police officer gives him the unique perspective of the legal and liability issues.Jack is a former adjunct faculty member at Salve Regina University and lectures frequently throughout the United States.

Model Policy: Off-Duty Action

I.    Purpose: The purpose of this order is to adopt safety directives and guidelines for dealing with the carrying of firearms while in an off-duty status for dealing with an officer’s duty and responsibility to take action in response to criminal [...]

No Liability in Search Warrant Execution:

In Los Angeles County v. Rettele et. al, i the United States Supreme Court reviewed a civil rights lawsuit brought against Los Angeles County officers who had executed a search warrant at a home that had been sold and was no longer in [...]

Persons with Disabilities

Each and everyday, law enforcement officers throughout the United States come into contact with persons who are suffering from some disability. Some of these persons are suffering from a disability that would make them eligible for protection under the Americans [...]

U.S. Supreme Court Decides Passenger Privacy Case:

The United States Supreme Court decided another case impacting law enforcement operations on June 18th. i The case concerns whether a passenger in a vehicle which has been unlawfully stopped can challenge the basis of the stop when evidence is discovered relative [...]

Scott v. Harris Decision

The United States Supreme Court concluded that an officer’s decision to terminate a pursuit by ramming the fleeing motorist, who’s driving posed a serious threat to other motorists, does not violate the 4th Amendment. Victor Harris was clocked speeding by [...]

Georgia v. Randolph

The United States Supreme Court further clarified the rules regarding consent searches in homes in Randolph v. Georgia, decided March 22, 2006. The Randolph case began as a fairly typical call to the police. Mr. and Mrs. Randolph were involved [...]

United States v. Grubbs

United States v. Grubb, 547 U.S. ___, slip op. 04-1414 (3/21/06) Anticipatory Search Warrant Valid Though Triggering Event Not Included in Warrant. The United States Supreme Court held that an anticipatory search warrant, that described the triggering event for execution [...]

Go to Top